"With an average annual rainfall of 1,170 mm, India is one of the wettest countries in the world. Still, even with its rich natural water resources, with more than 300,000 square meters of bodies of water, the country is plagued by environmental issues such as water pollution from raw sewage and runoff of agricultural pesticides (Sharma, 2005). Another major problem is that tap water is not potable throughout the country. This implies that people, especially those from the lower income bracket, cannot avail of clean drinking water, since these have to be bought. Repugnant as it may sound, it is a reality that millions of Indians queue up everyday at public taps for one of life's most precious commodity — water." -ADB

Thursday, 3 December 2009

India's 2020 target: Reduce emission by 20-25% - India - The Times of India

India's 2020 target: Reduce emission by 20-25% - India - The Times of India: "NEW DELHI: Four days ahead of the Copenhagen climate summit, India on Thursday announced it will reduce its emission intensity by 20-25% by 2020.

Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh, in an eloquent exposition of the country's stand which he said was worked out in concert with some developing countries including China, said India was reducing the emission intensity -- the level of greenhouse gas emissions per unit of GDP -- in its own interest.


India's announcement came a few days after China announced a 40-45 percent cut in its emissions intensity by 2020 compared to 2005, Brazil announced 38-42 percent and Indonesia 26 percent.


India's emissions intensity is already lower than other emerging economies, and the minister said it had decreased 17.6 percent between 1990 and 2005.


The minister's reply came in a 65-minute speech at the end of a debate in the Lok Sabha on what India's position will be at the Dec 7-18 climate summit in the Danish capital.


Dispelling opposition fears of a 'sellout' at the summit of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Ramesh said: 'India will not accept a legally binding emission reduction cut and it will not accept a peaking date on its emissions.'


He said there would be another non-negotiating position. Emission reduction actions India took on its own would not be open to international scrutiny, but 'depending on concessions we can get from western countries, and in consultation with China, Brazil, South Africa and other countries in G77, we can consider opening to international review all our mitigation actions supported by international finances'.


Starting his speech with the observation, 'India is the country most vulnerable to climate change', Ramesh said this was due to four reasons -- the country's dependence on the monsoons, the receding of the Himalayan glaciers, the presence of ecologically sensitive areas, and the fact that climate change would exacerbate the effect of mining in forest areas of Jharkhand, Orissa and Chhattisgarh.


Ramesh said the problem was that India had hardly any information of its own on climate change effects, which he called 'a pathetic state of affairs'. Most of the information was derived from Western sources, he said, adding that there was urgent need to start research and have 'our own scientific capacity' to study all aspects of climate change in India.


India should have started researching effects of climate change 20 years ago, Ramesh said, adding that the government had started a network of laboratories to research the phenomenon. 'We must have our own scientific capacity to understand the impact of climate change.'


Talking about India's position at Copenhagen, he said: 'The prime minister's instructions to me was, India has not caused the problem of global warming, but try and make sure india is part of the solution; be constructive, be proactive.


'Then I asked myself what is India's position. I found that it only was that our per capita emissions were very low, yours (western countries) very high, therefore we won't do it, we're entitled to pollute more.'


The minister felt India had to move beyond this position because it 'must negotiate from a position of strength, of leadership. We're going to Copenhagen in a positive frame of mind, prepared to be flexible. We want a comprehensive and equitable agreement. We are realistic enough to know such an agreement may not materialise, but we will work with like minded countries, with China, and with others, to ensure there is a comprehensive and equitable arrangement.'


He announced that India, China, Brazil and South Africa had tabled a draft to this effect to the UNFCCC Wednesday.


Reacting to criticism from the Left parties, Ramesh was at pains to reiterate that India was a part of G77 and China negotiating bloc, 'but that does not mean we don't talk to anybody else; and every time we talk to America it does not mean we're selling our country down the drain'.


'Having global aspirations and assuming global responsibilities are two sides of the same coin,' the minister held.


He said the 20-25 percent emissions intensity cut had been worked out by the Planning Commission. 'The 12th Five Year Plan which starts in 2012 will be based on a low-carbon growth strategy.'


Explaining how this would be done, Ramesh outlined a five-step plan of action:


* Mandatory fuel efficiency standards for all vehicles by December 2011;


* A building code that encouraged energy conservation, with a recommendation to local governments to make this mandatory;


* Amendments to various laws to reduce energy intensity of industrial activities;


* Regular monitoring of the state of the forests, which now absorbed about 10 percent of India's greenhouse gas emissions; and


* Half of the new coal based power plants coming up to use clean coal technologies -- super critical, ultra super critical and coal gasification.


'This is our baseline,' Ramesh said. 'If we have a successful agreement at Copenhagen, if it's equitable, if our worries are taken care of, we are prepared to do even more.'


Ramesh said: 'Flexibility does not mean sellout, it only means ability to move in rapidly evolving situations; we're not living in isolation; we're going there to get the best agreement for India.'"

2 comments:

Unknown said...

I agree with Mr. Ramesh our Environment Minister when he speaks about R & D done in the field of Climate Change. But who is to look into it. At first place doing research in any field in India is so difficult in the sense that apart from the research topic the young scientist are made to deal with many more petty issue in and around. Secondly, i feel that there should be some marketing done by govt to encourage or aware young aspiring scientists to deal in such issues which r threat to the world also. i have seen young scientist aspiring to do there PhD who take guidance from there guides for selecting topics for there research. In this discussion such issue never had place till last one year.

Water Resources Management said...

Agree with you. I have seen the same during M Tech /Ph D days in IIT campus

But i believe future is very bright for scientists ,PE deal makers and policy makers as new doors open up in climate research-technology side etc.

Govt has a big role to play.A small ministry like MNRE can not do justice in everything -solar,wind,small hydro.

MoEF is already busy with so many other activities.

will Our national Govt form a new Big ministry directly under PMO and monitor the national Action Plan and Missions(like they have done in NHAI)?

thats a big Question

wait and watch, post Copenhagen

Subscribe this Blog: Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

View Nityananda Mukherjee's profile on LinkedIn
Disclaimer: This Blog is a small step towards building a knowledge-based platform for Professionals interested in "water resources management(WRM)". One of the objective is knowledge dissemination. Please note that VIEWs expressed here are purely personal.